Damp Meters

Damp meters are indispensable tools for detecting moisture in buildings, aiding in diagnosing damp issues and ensuring structural integrity. These devices come in two primary types: radio frequency and conductance (or resistance), each with its own set of advantages and drawbacks.

Radio Frequency Damp Meters

Principle of Operation

Radio frequency (RF) damp meters operate by emitting radio waves and analysing the reflected waves. They are calibrated to maximise reflection or resonance from water, providing a rapid and non-invasive means to trace damp to its source.

Protimeter: The Industry Standard

Protimeter is one of the first and most revered RF damp meters used by many surveyors. Known for its accuracy and reliability, it, however, comes with a higher price tag. It’s calibrated for plasterboard, with readings below 200REL (Relative Units) considered dry. For standard solid walls, readings below 300REL denote dry conditions, while readings up to 999REL represent saturation at depth.

Pros and Cons

  • Pros:
    • Swift Detection: Ideal for quick surveys and pinpointing the centre of damp outbreaks or leaks.
    • Depth Analysis: Capable of detecting moisture at various depths.
  • Cons:
    • Cost: Generally more expensive than conductance meters.
    • Calibration: Requires calibration for different materials to ensure accurate readings.

Conductance (Resistance) Damp Meters

Principle of Operation

Conductance damp meters measure the electrical resistance or conductance between two electrodes inserted into the material. They are particularly effective for detecting surface damp and are often calibrated for timber.

Wood Moisture Equivalence (WME) Range

These meters operate within a range of about 8WME to 99WME. Damp is typically indicated somewhere between 20 and 30 WME, although this can vary based on the building material and salt content (as conductance measures salt, not water).

Pros and Cons

  • Pros:
    • Surface Moisture Detection: Excellent for detecting surface moisture, providing immediate readings.
    • Cost-effective: Generally less expensive than RF meters.
  • Cons:
    • Limited Depth Analysis: Primarily suited for surface moisture detection.
    • Material-Specific Calibration: Requires calibration for accurate readings on different materials.

Caveats in Damp Meter Usage

Both RF and conductance damp meters can yield false positives and false negatives. They indicate the presence of dampness but cannot ascertain its cause. A high damp meter reading at a wall base can result from numerous factors, with condensation being the most common (85% of cases), followed by leaks and penetrating damp. Rising damp, attributed to groundwater, is rarely the root cause and impossible to confirm solely with a damp meter.

The Advent of Affordable Damp Meters

The market is now witnessing the emergence of cost-effective meters, priced around $30, incorporating both radio frequency and conductance functionalities. These budget-friendly alternatives are commendable for identifying damp and tracing it to its source.

The Real Value of Damp Meters

Damp meters shine in their ability to not only detect damp but to track its source, measure the height of its rise, and monitor its progression over time, particularly following remedial actions or other interventions like increased moisture absorption. These insights are crucial for devising effective solutions to eradicate damp issues, safeguarding the longevity and integrity of the property.


Damp meters, whether radio frequency or conductance, serve as the cornerstone of damp diagnostics, each with its set of merits and demerits. The choice between them hinges on the specifics of the task at hand, budget constraints, and the material under examination. With the advent of economical dual-function meters, the realm of damp detection is becoming more accessible, aiding countless property owners in navigating the challenges posed by moisture intrusion.

Scroll to Top